1. Defendant C’s KRW 23,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from January 1, 2014 to May 15, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 7, 2010, the Plaintiff leased the lease deposit of KRW 30 million, and the lease term from December 7, 2010 to December 6, 2012 (the Plaintiff’s de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiff, without the actual participation of the lessor B at the time of entering into the instant lease contract, was to prepare a contract for the lease of the loan with the Defendant C, who was in charge of the lessor’s agent and real estate broker at one time. The contract contains the name of the lessor in the lessor column, the lessor’s agent and the real estate broker column, but the name of each Defendant C is written in the lessor column, but only the signature of the Defendant C, which is not the B’s seal, appears in the lessor’s seal column.

C. On December 6, 2012, the Plaintiff implicitly renewed the lease after the expiration of the term of the instant lease, but around June 2013, the Plaintiff demanded the return of the lease deposit by expressing the intent to terminate the said lease contract to Defendant C.

Accordingly, around September 2013, Defendant C requested that the Plaintiff return the Plaintiff’s lease deposit with the deposit that would be repaired and received from another person by setting the lease deposit. Accordingly, Defendant C first requested that the Plaintiff return the lease deposit with the deposit that would be paid KRW 7 million out of the lease deposit, and the above loan will be handed over. However, Defendant C as a collateral for the unpaid lease deposit amount of KRW 23 million.