logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.28 2016나2071516
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases being cited or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or written evidence] The “Evidence No. 10, No. 8-1, No. 2, and No. 9” shall be added to the part at the second bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The 3 to 5th of the judgment of the first instance court in the third to 3th of the judgment of the first instance, "the defendant claims B" shall be raised as follows.

The Defendant asserts that, in addition to the instant loans in active property at the time of the assignment of the instant claims, the Defendant: (a) claims for loans of KRW 310 million against E; (b) claims for loans of KRW 330 million against I; (c) claims for loans of KRW 300 million against G; and (d) claims for loans of KRW 450 million against J; and (e) claims for loans of KRW 400 million against J, the Defendant stated that “from around 2008” of the first instance judgment of the first instance court No. 8 of the first instance judgment “(2010 to “from 2010.”

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion with the court of first instance, and thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow