logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.28 2016나2061250
매매대금
Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases being cited or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] Article 10 of the third 10th 10th 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance “A paid in full the purchase price to the Defendant not later than January 20, 2014.” The Plaintiff paid in full the purchase price of KRW 140 million to the Defendant by January 20, 2014.”

Following the third 19th 19th 19th 1 of the first instance judgment, the following facts are added to the facts without dispute, Gap's 1 to 9, Eul's 1 and 8 (including the number, if any), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The "(the defendant is reasonable to regard the defendant as F)" in 11-15 of the court of first instance shall be deleted.

In full view of the following facts in the sixth sentence of the judgment of the first instance court, “The foregoing facts and evidence, evidence, evidence Nos. 11 through 13, 15, and evidence No. 6, evidence No. 6, witness I of the first instance trial, and testimony of G,” shall be taken into account in the following circumstances:

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion with the court of first instance. Thus, the defendant's appeal against the plaintiffs is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow