logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.01 2016나52712
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the first instance is cited or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance was sent as “the remittance was received under the name of interest.”

On April 15, 2015, the first instance court’s decision Nos. 8 and 9 stated that “B, on April 15, 2015, entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on the transfer of KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff of the claim against Defendant C,” which read that “B, on April 15, 2015, transferred the claim against the Plaintiff for the loan to the Plaintiff amounting to KRW 5 million with the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff, on behalf of the Plaintiff, notified the Defendant C of the transfer of the above loan claim by the delivery of the duplicate of the instant complaint.”

On March 11, 2008, the court of first instance added "the amount of KRW 5 million on March 10, 2008" to the second page 10.

In the second instance judgment, the remittance was received under the name of “the remittance” as the second instance judgment.

‘Flag' has been written.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow