logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.21 2015고정2317
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a husband who is engaged in clothing trade business using the trade name “C” located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is an enterprise operated by B.

No one shall invite a foreigner to enter the Republic of Korea by improper means, such as a false statement of fact or a false fidelity guarantee, or arrange such invitation.

1. On June 2010, the Defendant intended to invite operators E (E and F) of “D” (E and F) of “D,” a Chinese clothing production company, which was in a transactional relationship with the Defendant entering into a contract for the manufacture and supply of female clothing with the Defendant, to Korea, but E was unable to invite due to lack of business establishment (hereinafter “business establishment registration”), and E was invited as if “G and H” of “B (G and H) is an employee of “D (G and H) with limited liability business establishment,” and the Defendant was asked to invite “W (G and H) to enter into a business consultation with the Defendant,” and was willing to receive the proposal and to proceed with the false invitation of E and G, China, China.

Accordingly, the Defendant, around August 30, 2010, issued a false certificate of employment to E in China, and around August 30, 2010, issued a false certificate of employment to E in the former “C” office, and then filed an application for a visa with respect to E, with the General Maodong Branch accompanied by the above documents, inasmuch as E is an employee of the “D” and “D” and “G”, although there is no reason to invite the former “D” as an employee of the “D”) and as if the latter is an employee of the “GEEEEE”, the latter prepared a false certificate of employment.

Accordingly, the defendant invited foreigners by illegal means.

2. On February 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) around February 201, at the above “C” office; and (b) in fact, E is an operator of “D”, and I (I and J) is “D”.

arrow