beta
Text
Defendant
A, B, and C shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant D shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
Defendant
A, B, and C respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
D is the representative of G in the Gu, Si, Si, Si, and Gu, and Defendant A is the representative of the I corporation (five members) engaged in the production business of feed, Cheong, Cheong, and Y, the contents of which are less than 18% and which are less than 18% of fiber quality in Gu, Si, Si, Gu, Si, Si, si, and Do. [Agricultural Fishery Prior: Rural Development Administration]. Defendant B is the representative of the K corporation (five members) engaged in the production business of research fees in Gu, Si, Si, Gu, Si, Si, and Gu. Defendant C is the representative of M corporation (seven members) engaged in the production business of research fees in Gu, Si, Si, Gu.
Around 2010 and around 2012, the victims of the Gu-U.S., promoted the “the creation project for the early feed production complex” that provides support for the purchase cost of equipment for the production of research fees to reduce production costs through the mechanization and collectiveization of the production of research fees. At the request of producers' organizations, such as agricultural partnership corporations, the subjects of the project shall be selected at the request of the subsidized project operators. After the completion of the project, the above subjects of the project at their own expense (40% in 2010, 50% in 2010, 2012), the victims shall pay the remainder (50% in 2010, 15% in 2012, 35% in Si expenses, 40% in 2012, 18% in 201, and 42% in Si expenses in 202.
1. On March 10, 2010, Defendant D and A’s joint criminal administration Defendant A were selected as a subsidiary project operator of the above research fee production complex development project at KRW 151,980,00,000, subsidies of KRW 90,000, and self-payment of KRW 61,980,00,00.
5. From around 16.16. Around 10.16.3, three agricultural machinery, such as blackers, were supplied to Defendant D with KRW 100,470,00, but the money was insufficient to pay KRW 40,470,000 to Defendant D’s payment of the money. Defendant D’s payment of the money to Defendant D is to pay the money to Defendant D at the face of paying the money that she has to pay.