beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years.
However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is the representative of F in North Korea E, and Defendant A is the person who has overall control over the whole business as the former duties of the F.
The Defendants knew that the terms and conditions of subsidization in relation to G support projects being promoted in the Disabledbuk-do in 2009 meet the requirements of “40% of the national expenses, 10% of the Do expenses, 20% of the Si/Gun expenses, and 30% of the self-payment,” and agreed with H (397,800,000 of the total project expenses, 129,336,000 of the self-payment), I Agricultural Corporation (representative J, 390,000 of the total project expenses, 126,80,000 of the self-payment, and 126,80,000 of the self-payment) to be paid by H in full, and the person to be borne by I would be 76,80,000 of the total amount to be paid by each business operator as if he had paid the contributions.
In addition, the Defendants had the intent to acquire subsidies by creating false documents as if they purchased and supplied more amount of G products than those actually purchased and supplied for the purpose of recovering the self-paid funds directly appropriated by the Defendants.
The Defendants, in collusion with the above H and J on November 27, 2009, demanded G subsidies on behalf of the above H and I farming association corporations in the agricultural and fishing village of the city of the elderly Dong in the king of the Dong-Eup of the North Korean city on behalf of the above H and I as if the above H et al. were normally borne by them, and as if they were to purchase 8,5140,000 won of wire ropes G from K, even though they purchased 12,120 tons of the above L, they deceiving the elderly group by claiming for subsidies with false documentary evidence as if they purchased 12,120 tons of the above H et al. on November 30, 2009. At the same time, the Defendants were deprived of the victim's 531,64,000 won for G subsidies of the above H et al. (the amount excluded from H's subsidy decision 268,464,000 won, 200 won, 200 won and amount excluded from total project expenses.