Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2013, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by publicly pointing out false facts by stating that “F is so low that many males are cut off at a lower level” against the victim F, when the Defendant hears D and facility engineer, who is a warden, at the management office of the Dasan-si, Yasi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. Investigation report (the head of apartment management office and telephone communications);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report accompanying business sites);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's assertion regarding the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the apartment management office of May 14, 2013 did not have any entry between them, and that there was no fact that the defendant made a statement that defames the victim as stated in its reasoning.

On May 14, 2013, the witness D testified that the Defendant made the statement that he had made the statement clearly at the management office on May 14, 2013, and that the Defendant made the statement that he had made the said statement at the time when the witness E was engaged in the above apartment management office work. According to the working day of the above apartment management office, on May 14, 2013, the Defendant was conducting the installation of banner and indoor disinfection on May 31, 2013 that he had the Defendant gone to the management office. ③ around May 31, 2013, the Defendant got the victim from only Ha, G, and the victim met with only three persons, and the victim confirmed ctt at the apartment management office, but the victim did not have any responsibility for ctt at the investigative agency or investigation agency (the victim No. 48 or 49 of the investigation record).