Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

At around 11:30 on January 30, 2013, A, at the Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu apartment management office, deemed that, notwithstanding the fact that the husband of the woman was not the head of the traffic department of the Shipping Police Station, A did not do so to the chairperson of the said apartment management office, and that, despite the fact that the husband of the woman was not the head of the traffic department of the Shipping Police Station, A, as the victim I had been asked from H to inquire about the actual origin of the child, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the witness I's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness H’s legal statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Parts of the offense under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the provisional payment order;

1. Defendant A, B, the auditor of the council of occupants' representatives of Busan Metropolitan City G apartment, and C, at the time of the amendment of the management rules in 2010, shall be the Dong representative with 101 Dong 3-4Ra, and Dong representative with 109 Dong 1-2Ra, 109 Dong.

Defendant

At around 17:50 on January 2, 2013, the Defendants were not aware of the fact that, at the time of the amendment of the management rules in 2010, the victims I, who were the representatives of the occupants at the time of the amendment of the management rules in 2010, visited the above G apartment 104-dong 1202, the president of the council of occupants' representatives, and changed the cost of cleaning and expenses from ordinary to household to the imposition by household was changed by the law of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. I said that the Defendants were not aware of the fact that there was a change in the law of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. I said that it was a false horse dispute, and that I is a person who was under way and is a fraud."

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to damage the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

B. Defendant A’s sole crime of defamation against Defendant A was committed on January 15, 2013, around 09:00, and around 107 apartment units of the above G G, Defendant A had the victim I.