logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 03. 16. 선고 2016두62504 판결
법인자금 횡령의 귀속자에게 소득처분[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-47934 ( November 11, 2016)

Title

Disposal of income to a person who has reverted to corporate funds;

Summary

Even if there is a damage claim for the embezzlement fund in the company, if there is an economic interest between the embezzlement and the company, it shall be considered as the outflow from the company, and if there is no economic interest, it shall be deemed as the internal reservation

Related statutes

Article 106 (1) 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the former Corporate Tax Act

Cases

2016du62504 Notice of change in amount of income

Plaintiff

BBB

Defendant

AA Head of the Tax Office

Conclusion of Pleadings

oly 2017.17

Imposition of Judgment

oly, 2017.16

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, all appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are borne by each party. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow