logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 08. 31. 선고 2017두44503 판결
법인자금 횡령의 귀속자에게 소득처분[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-7206 ( April 13, 2017)

Title

Disposal of income to a person who has reverted to corporate funds;

Summary

Even if there is a damage claim for the embezzlement fund in the company, if there is an economic interest between the embezzlement and the company, it shall be viewed as the outflow from the company.

Related statutes

Article 106 (1) 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the former Corporate Tax Act

Cases

2016du44503 Notice of change in amount of income

Plaintiff

BBB

Defendant

AA Head of the Tax Office

Conclusion of Pleadings

2017.06.07

Imposition of Judgment

8.31.20

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

The ground of appeal was examined in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment below, but the ground of appeal was examined.

The assertion does not include the reasons prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal

It is judged that it cannot be accepted.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

section 3.

arrow