beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for six months, for six months, and for ten months, for each of the defendants C.
except that this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the driver of D 27 tons of d dump truck truck truck truck, the driver of E 25 tons of dump truck truck, and the defendant C is the petroleum retailer who operates a G gas station from around April 201 to the Gangnam-gun F of Gangwon-gu.
In order to pay fuel subsidies to a truck pursuant to Article 43 (2) of the Trucking Transport Business Act, the government implemented the "Rules on Management of Truck Fuel Subsidies" with the content of paying fuel subsidies by the last day of the following month, by paying fuel purchase cards whenever oil is paid to the vehicle on condition that the kind of oil that the fuel of the vehicle is directly stored in the vehicle at the oil station, which is consistent with the fuel of the vehicle, is paid to the vehicle.
Defendant
A and B, upon the rise in the fuel cost due to the increase in the fuel price, with the fact that the fuel cost was borne, they are mixed with oil which is relatively low in value on the fuel, and instead, they are left the truck with the oil purchase card as if they were fully passed through, thereby receiving the fuel subsidy from the competent authority by paying the price through the oil purchase card. Defendant C was willing to assist and facilitate the above Defendants in receiving the fuel subsidy, even though they were aware of the fact that they want to acquire the fuel subsidy.
1. Defendant A and Defendant C
A. On February 8, 2012, Defendant A, at the above G gas station, 91 liters via D cargo, put the gas into the cargo vehicle in a cargo vehicle near the gas station by containing 80 literss, such as plastic containers, and then pay 300 liters via the cargo vehicle as if it had limited liability, Defendant A paid 53,50 won with the oil purchase card (KB card, I) issued in the name of mother H and received an amount equivalent to the same amount from the said card company and had the said card company receive the amount equivalent to the same amount from the victim Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is the competent administrative agency.