A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 21:40 on October 17, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Man-Ma8003,” committed assault to the victim, who was working in the 11th nurse room of the 11st floor of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu Hospital, Incheon Bupyeong-gu, and caused the injury of the victim, such as catum d (n, 29 years of age), which requires medical treatment for about 10 days, by cutting down the shoulder of the victim two times, automatic blood pressure in that place, and cat down the victim’s head with automatic blood pressure in the victim’s body.

2. On March 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 13:20 on March 22, 2019, the victim G (the 64 years of age) who is a security guard requested a drinking measurement; (b) refused it; and (c) assaulted the victim on his own hand in order to kill the victim’s breath; and (d) when the victim met the part of the victim’s breath, the victim’s breath of breath.

Summary of Evidence

No. 1 Crimes

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and H;

1. Each police statement made to D and H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Second crime as indicated in a medical certificate;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes after closure;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor) that govern the crime;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes as provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act from among concurrent crimes (within the scope of adding up the long-term punishments of the above two crimes)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. As to Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Probation Criminal Act and his defense counsel’s assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel, regarding Article 1 of the judgment, the Defendant had a blood pressure and doubt.

The fact is that there is no fact that there is no intention to leave the victim with the blood pressure or with the victim.

However, this shall not apply.