beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 2014, the Defendant was working at a normal workplace in the Internet lending site, etc., and the Defendant came to know of the method of receiving a loan from a financial institution by preparing a false document as if the lease money for the lease of a house is necessary, and C and D exercise overall control over the crime, such as preparing a false certificate of employment necessary for receiving a loan, and E play the role of attending a financial institution or an authorized intermediary office with the Defendant, and F plays the role of a false lessor who provides an apartment owned by his mother G, and the Defendant conspired in sequence to play the role of a false lessee as if he rents an apartment owned by the said G.
According to the above public offering, the Defendant drafted a false lease contract as if the Defendant leased the “H apartment 506 Dong 505, 505, Y apartment 505, e.g., leased deposit 150 million won,” which is owned by the said G, at the I Authorized Brokerage Office located in H apartment complex around August 20, 2014.
After that, on August 2014, the Defendant filed an application for a loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the house with an employee in charge of the loan who is unable to know his name at the location of the insullle Don-si, the Defendant submitted a false employment certificate, income tax collection certificate, etc. as if the Defendant were in office in the “K company” in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, J. 101, and as if the Defendant were in office in the “K company” in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu.
However, the Defendant did not have any occupation and had no intention to use the above apartment in the above "K company", and there was no intention to reside in the above apartment complex after leasing it, and upon receiving the loan of the lease fund, it was thought that it was used by dividing it with the related persons, including the Defendant, and there was no intention to use it as the lease deposit.
Accordingly, the defendant is C, D, E, F.