logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단6826
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for larceny, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Macheon Prison on February 15, 2012. On November 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for the crime of injury, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 26, 2016.

Around June 2012, the Defendant discovered the method of receiving a loan through the Internet, but became aware of the name “C” and “D,” which is the hub for loan brokerage, and came to work normally from the people, and came to know of the method of receiving a loan from a financial institution by preparing false documents as if the lease money for the lease of a house is necessary, and the aforementioned Brazil took overall control of the crime, such as preparing a false certificate of employment, etc. necessary for receiving a loan from the financial institution, and E (the suspension of prosecution on June 21, 2016) takes charge of a false lessor’s role as if he rents an apartment owned by the said E, and the Defendant conspired in sequence to act as a lessee as if he rents the apartment owned by the said E.

On August 10, 2012, the Defendant prepared a false lease contract as if the Defendant leased the rental deposit amount of KRW 150 million to the Seoul Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Apartment Building KRW 102 dong 403,000,000.

After that, on August 22, 2012, the Defendant filed an application for a loan of the entire house loan with an employee in charge of loans whose name cannot be known at the red branch of the victim bank in Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government. On August 22, 2012, the Defendant submitted a false employment certificate, a false employment statement, etc. as if the Defendant were employed in the State I.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any occupation and worked for the above (State) I, and there is no idea that he would rent and reside in the above apartment.

arrow