Defendant

A person who is punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Food Sanitation Act is a person who actually operates a general restaurant under the trade name of “D” in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

No person shall drink alcoholic beverages with customers, provide entertainment services by singing or dancing, or arrange such activities to provide entertainment to other persons at a place where food entertainment business is conducted for profit.

Nevertheless, on November 17, 2016, from around 23:00 to around 0:10 on November 18, 2016, the Defendant violated the business operator’s code of practice, such as drinking alcohol in company with two customers E, etc. who found the place within the above “D” book operated by the Defendant.

2. On November 18, 2016, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act (hereinafter “D”) around 01:00, the Defendant provided the name and resident registration number I of H to the above patroler G, who was requested to present an identification card for identification by the police officer in charge of the Defendant’s violation of the Food Sanitation Act (hereinafter “H”), while carrying out his/her duties as if he/she was “H”, and used the name and resident registration number I of H to the above patroler G to deny another’s resident registration number.

3. On November 18, 2016, the Defendant is required to prepare a written statement from the Suwon Police Station G on the charge of violating the Food Sanitation Act of the Defendant at around 01:00 of the above “D,” and the Defendant entered the written statement in the document form “H” and “H” in the written form without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to enter the written statement in the written form and the written form of the written statement form and the written form of the investigative process confirmation, which was kept under the control of the Defendant’s charges of violating the Food Sanitation Act, in which he/she entered the document form “H” and “H” and “H” in the written form of the written statement form, and then entered “H” in the confirmation column of the written investigation process confirmation form, and then forged another person’s signature by continuing to be signed by him/her, and such signature and investigation process confirmation letter may not be known from G.