logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.07.09 2015고단1467
공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 7, 2015, at around 04:00, the Defendant expressed a 112 report that “C” restaurant in front of the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si B, and that “D Zone E belonging to the Kimpo-gu, Kimpo-si, and police officers, such as the police officer, “I would like to get off her from her will or her will.” On the one hand, the above E, etc. were under the direction of E one time under the direction of E due to the defect that the Defendant attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult. After that, other police officers arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties and then carried the defect that other police officers want to carry in the 112-lane patrol and again carried on the part of E, the left part of E, as E, was put on one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, and the police officers dispatched after receiving the report of 112 arrested the Defendant for the same criminal facts as those mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and take a bath to “this son” in GYF Dotata 112 patrols, and walking behind the driver’s seat on several occasions, thereby breaking the side part of the knife and leaving the knife on the back part of the 112 patrols, the Defendant broken off the knife by walking the knife at several times.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The application of relevant photographs, D district substitute work days, estimates of general repair expenses, and Acts and subordinate statutes on the card slip;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) 1.

arrow