logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.05.19 2016고정835
사기방조
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant B’s aiding and abetting the fraud of Defendant B is the representative of the Motor Vehicle Repair Company D.

1) From October 29, 2013, E and F conspiredd with each other on October 29, 2013, around 20:49, F F’s H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H dyle, which was parked in G studio at Jeonju-si, and part of the I K5 driver’s seat on the part of the I K5 driver’s seat driven by E.

E and F immediately accepted the accident as the call center for the damage insurance company, which was affiliated with K5 vehicles, as it is a traffic accident caused by negligence after such intentional accident.

E and F decided to receive insurance proceeds at a low price from a general repair business entity, other than a certified maintenance business center, in order to receive insurance proceeds in the form of "unrepaired cost" in which the estimated value is received in cash by estimating repair costs, replacement costs of parts, etc. without repairing an accident vehicle by deceiving an insurance company as an insurance product as soon as the accident occurred, the E and F intended to receive insurance proceeds under the name of vehicle repair costs, etc. by viewing excess profits for the difference.

Defendant

B, as a used motor vehicle in the past,

The F received a request from the insurance company that “part of the accident occurred, and the insurance company wishes to receive the unpaid repair cost, and the highest estimate would be cut.”

Defendant

B It is known that it is fraud to receive unrepair costs from an insurance company after the intentional accident. B should not request the insurance company to issue a written estimate for repair of the vehicle involved in the accident to claim insurance money.

Nevertheless, on October 29, 2013, Defendant B issued a written estimate of the repair cost of HH L-A-D-D-D-D-J's office in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to request the payment of repair cost as an insurance company for damage to the company M-A-D-U-D-J's office.

After all, E and F acquired 3,857,850 won in total by receiving 1,105,850 won from the repair cost of the vehicle for the vehicle for the vehicle for the 1,800,000 won and the 5 vehicle repair cost accepted by K, which entered into D from the insurance company for the damage insurance company for the company for the settlement of accounts, and Defendant B made a third party by deceiving another person.

arrow