logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.30 2017고정92
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of a car E, and Defendant B is the driver of a car in FK5, and Defendant C is the regular manager of the car industry in Gunsan GG, and Defendant A is the husband of Defendant B.

In the case of external vehicles, the Defendants knew that the insurance company would pay cash prior to the repair of the vehicle in the name of the repair cost, and conspired to acquire the vehicle of Defendant A and the vehicle of Defendant B in the name of the repair cost by receiving the repair cost by pretending to have a traffic accident as if the accident occurred.

Defendant

B On July 5, 2016, around 02:35, at the I parking lot located at H in the Gunsan-si, the fact is that the Defendant A was parked and the FK5 passenger cars operated by Defendant B were not in the part of the accident. However, even though the victim KB non-life insurance Co., Ltd. received the accident as if the damage occurred due to Defendant B’s negligence, and claimed the insurance money, and it was paid 8,000,000 won to the Defendant’s account from the damaged person for the unpaid repair cost.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim and received property from the injured party as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. An accident research report;

1. A report on results of dispatch to the site;

1. The claim for the payment of automobile insurance money [the relation between the Defendants and the background of the accident alleged by Defendant B, i.e., the other party’s back door to the front door during parking, and the damaged part of Defendant B’s vehicle and the damaged part of Defendant A’s vehicle are inconsistent with the above accident situation. In full view of the above facts, Defendant B reported such an accident and had Defendant A receive insurance money in bad faith, Defendant B filed a false insurance report in collusion with other Defendants, thereby committing the instant crime.

arrow