beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person working as a real estate brokerage assistant, and the defendant B is a person engaged in the real estate business and is aware of it as a follow-up to society.
On December 3, 2014, at the back of the F Office building operated by Defendant B located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. on December 16:53, 2014, Defendant A driven a car of GM5 and left to the left and was parked at that place, and received the front front wheels of Defendant B’s car owned by Defendant B in front of the passenger car of Defendant B.
After the accident, the Defendants: (a) caused the destruction of king, such as tearing the front front door of the HAD car managed by Defendant B; (b) damaged the front door and fixing it to B; and (c) conspired to obtain insurance proceeds from the insurance company by using the fact that the repair cost would not be increased even if the repair cost exceeds 2 million won when the repair of the vehicle is performed by the insurance company after receiving the accident; and (d) reported the insurance insurance for the instant accident to the Hyundai Commercial Insurance Co., Ltd. for the victims insured by the SM5 passenger vehicle.
Since then, the Defendants were transferred to the account in the name of Defendant B, an employee of the Defendant B, 5.2 billion won as transportation expense around December 28, 2014, and KRW 1,5270,000,000,000,000 from the victim company, from the victim company, to the account in the name of Defendant B, as an employee of the Defendant Company, respectively, for the repair expense around February 23, 2015, and paid KRW 50,000,000 to J under the name of vehicle siren, around February 23, 2015.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim company and acquired the total amount of 2,560,000 won under the pretext of repair expenses.
Summary of Evidence
1. The respective legal statements of K and L;
1. Statement made to K in the police statement;
1. The acceptance of modern maritime accidents;