The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal in light of the fact that the instant crime was caused by the victim’s wrongful claim for taxi charges, etc., the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant’s assertion of determination is that even though the actual taxi rate of KRW 7,90 is merely 7,90, the victim claimed an excessive amount of the taxi rate of KRW 13,00 after having arrived at the Defendant’s destination, and this became the cause of the instant crime.

In addition, the defendant asserts that even though the victim received 10,000 won in advance from the defendant's seat, the defendant claimed an excessive taxi fee, and that 2,100 won was given to the defendant while moving to a police box or a police station together with the defendant.

However, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim was found to have stopped for more than 20 minutes after arrival at the destination of the defendant. The defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the destination of the defendant and moved to the police box after receiving a 112 report at the destination of the defendant, while the victim was moving to the police box at the destination of the defendant, the victim could not take the defendant's name. The victim demanded that the victim take 2,100 won in return for 2,100 won in return for her taxi, but did not take the victim's desire and did not take the victim. This consistently stated that the victim was supported by the statement of the arrest of flagrant offender and the investigation report (victim and the suspect investigation, etc.) by the police officer at the time, and that the victim demanded more money than 7,900 won in return for the last time during operation, but this appears to have been caused by obstruction of the defendant's business operation.