Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant, who works in the B market, was a person who was on the job in the region near the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, was a person boarding a D-si operated by the victim C (year 42) in the village hotel located near the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City and was moving to the green dong,
On November 15, 2014, at around 21:45, the Defendant, at the front destination of the Friju station in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, and at around 21:45, 2014, entered the destination of the Friju station in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, “I would not have a taxi rate, and will be attached to the account later,” and the Defendant, as the Defendant did not pay the taxi fee, did not deny it and bring it back to the Defendant’s house, and assaulted the Victim’s head collection by her hand over the floor by putting down his clothes.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
(c) Expression of intention not to punish: Agreement submitted on December 12, 2014, which was after the institution of public prosecution of this case.
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;