logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.22 2017가합549617
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant B shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1 between the parties is as follows. The Plaintiff is a Dsung Foreign Service Corps located in Gangnam-gu Seoul (hereinafter “D Sung Foreign Service”) as follows.

(E) From November 17, 2012, the Defendant undergone an operation on the same parts in a total of three times, including the Defendant’s surgery on the extension of the river basin, and the Defendant’s Party E (hereinafter “E”) located in the Sungnam-si Complex.

A) From April 28, 2016, a person who had undergone an operation on the same side twice more than twice. (2) Defendant B works for D sexual surgery and performed three-time operations against the Plaintiff. Defendant C is a doctor who works for E external surgery and takes charge of two-time operations against the Plaintiff.

B. (1) On November 3, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) was provided counseling and treatment on the extension of outflow surgery with D’s sexual surgery; and (b) on November 17, 2012, the Plaintiff inserted Bospheric material from Defendant B, i.e., the following as a part of the Defendant B, and inserted Bospheric material; and (c) influscing the drinking water of Bospheric material (on the left left left left left left right right right right right right right right right right road 235cc) (hereinafter “the instant primary operation”).

(2) From the first operation of this case, the Plaintiff complained of the pain on the left part of the left part (at the time of the instant operation) and started treatment from November 20, 2012 (at the time of the instant operation).

From December 18, 2012, the lower part of the left part of the lower part of the ship and showing the shape of the upper part of the ship. Accordingly, Defendant B prescribed the Plaintiff on December 26, 2012, and the Plaintiff provided a call call drug, and the first-wave treatment was also conducted from January 8, 2013.

3. After the first operation of the instant case, the Plaintiff continued to receive 1-2 times a week from 1-2 and take drugs, but did not show symptoms such as pains due to the construction of a Gu type, a change in the shape of a basin, etc., and Defendant B was the Plaintiff’s distribution in the same way as the first operation of the instant case on October 21, 2014.

arrow