logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.10 2017가단5003362
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Plaintiff; Defendant C is 250,455,607 won; Defendant C is jointly and severally with Defendant C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 4, 2016, Defendant C driven a car at D Sspoir (hereinafter “first vehicle”) on or around 18:41 on November 4, 2016, and driven a car at D Spoir (hereinafter “the first vehicle”) to operate the steering system to the right-hand side of the first vehicle, with a part of the lower left-hand side of the first vehicle, which is the part of the lower lower-hand side of the first vehicle, with a speed of approximately 86-91km/h above the speed of 60km/h from the sporade of the spondal bank of Incheon-do, the 199 Yangpo-ri, the spondal area of Incheon-do, the upper-hand side of which exceeds a speed of about 60km/h from the spondal bank of the spora, the lower-hand side of the first vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “the primary accident”). The impact of the instant accident is as follows: (a) the instant accident was pushed ahead to the opposite side of the road to the floor, and (b) in the opposite side of the Roman, F driven a Grano-car (hereinafter referred to as “the second vehicle”) and served E, which was used on the road as the front wheels of the second vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “the second accident”).

Due to the instant accident, E died.

(hereinafter referred to as “E”). (c)

Defendant D non-life insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract covering only the personal compensation I with respect to Defendant C, and Defendant D non-life insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B fire”) is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract regarding vehicles 2.

As a family member of the deceased, the deceased has a son(s) and his father H.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1-4, 7 evidence (including virtual number), Eul 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. According to the fact of recognition of liability, Defendant C, as a driver of the first vehicle, caused the first accident and the second.

arrow