logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.30 2014가합9420
소유권말소등기
Text

1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) on July 2014, Suwon District Court’s Suwon District Court’s registry office.

Reasons

1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet that was owned by the Plaintiff on June 5, 2014, the registration of ownership transfer under Defendant B was completed on July 8, 2014 on the ground of sale and purchase (hereinafter “the registration of ownership transfer”) and on the ground of the contract concluded on July 8, 2014, the Suwon District Court Registry of the Suwon District Court was completed the registration of ownership transfer of KRW C, the debtor B, the maximum debt amount of KRW 200,000,000 on the ground of the contract concluded on July 8, 2014 as of July 8, 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as “the establishment registration of creation of creation of creation of creation of creation of creation of creation of creation of creation of creation of creation of neighboring area of this case”). [The basis for recognition] did not dispute, each entry in Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including

2. The fact that the plaintiff's name omitted was forged with the plaintiff's identification card and completed the registration of transfer of ownership of this case with the plaintiff's certificate issued by the plaintiff's personal seal impression was not disputed between the parties. Thus, the registration of transfer of ownership of this case is invalid since the registration of transfer of ownership of this case was made based on the above facts. Thus, the defendant Eul is obligated to implement the registration of transfer of ownership of this case and the registration of cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow