logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2012.10.31 2012노269
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts is merely a fighting match between A and C, and there is no fact that the Defendant used violence and injury with C.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: A witness made a statement to the effect that he/she was faced with face face from the defendant among the facts charged in the case at an investigative agency and court of the court below. The above witness's statement is specific and consistent in the main part from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below, since it is not particularly distorted or false, and thus, he/she is credibility in the statement; G witness and H made each statement to the effect that he/she was drinking by the police; at the court of the court of the court below, the above witness's statement was made at the point of six months after the occurrence of the case; the witness's statement was made at the point of six months after the occurrence of the case; the witness's witness's witness's witness's witness's witness's testimony was made at the point of six months after the date of the court of the court below, and his/her memory can take place after the lapse of the time, and each of the above witness's statements could be found to have been distorted or distorted on the date of the police's statement.

arrow