The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not participate in the stocheon-gun's projects promoted, but the public official in the s tocheon-gun shall bear 50% of the construction cost, and the official in charge of the s tocheon-gun shall take the 50% of the construction cost, and the official in charge of the s token-gun shall take the s token-gun's projects, and the official in charge of the s token-gun's settlement documents shall also be a s token-gun

2. The court below rejected the defendant's assertion on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. The court below rejected the defendant's assertion on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. The witness E, who is a public official in charge of globalization project, stated in the court below that the defendant's assertion that the defendant's assertion that the above witness would not have been engaged in construction work at an amount of 50% subsidized by Ycheon-gun, although the court below stated that the defendant's assertion that the witness E, who is a public official in charge of globalization project, would not have been engaged in construction work at an amount of 50%, is not recommended or approved, and that the witness's statement would only be engaged in globalization project in order for the defendant to continue his business. In light of the above fact that the witness's statement is consistent from the investigation agency to the court below to the investigation agency, and there is no other motive to recommend or persuade the above witness's unreasonable method as argued by the defendant, it is difficult to see that the above witness's statement was distorted or false, and that the witness's statement of each public official in charge 50% is credibility.