The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the misapprehension of the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant, although the victim had never made a statement as to the contents of the facts charged in this case at the time and place of the charge in this case.

2. We examine whether or not the defendant made a statement as to the contents of the facts charged in this case at the time and place of the facts charged in this case. The court below held that each of the above witness E, F, and G statements was credibility, considering the witness's appearance, attitude, and penology which are being taken an oath before a judge, as well as whether or not it conforms to each witness's own rationality, logic, contradiction, or concurrent rule, or the witness's statement made in public court after being sworn, and the witness's appearance, attitude, and pen's statement made in public court after being taken an oath at the presence of a judge, each of the above witness E, E, F, and G's statement made in public court should be respected in principle, and even at the court of the trial, each of the above witness's statements cannot be viewed as specific and consistent with the main parts from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and there is no specific difference between each of the witness's statements and each of the witness's statements made in this case's testimony and its credibility.