1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The court's explanation of this part of the liability for damages is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of the liability for damages, each of the corresponding items of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages, and the period for calculation convenience shall, in principle, be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

At the time of the accident, the amount of damages shall be calculated at the rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct interim interest.

It shall be rejected that the parties' arguments are not separately explained.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 9, Eul evidence Nos. 6, Eul evidence Nos. 6, results of physical commission to the chief of the court of first instance, results of fact-finding inquiries, results of fact-finding inquiries to the F Religious Organization General Assembly and the F Religious Organization Go's Council, the purport of the whole arguments, and the purport of the whole arguments

A. Personal information 1) : The Plaintiff asserts that the amount of income based on the statistical income based on the statistical income based on the type of employment as well as the monthly income of at least 10 years of employment, among the incomes based on the statistical income based on the occupational category in the report on the fact-finding survey on employment by type of employment, should be calculated on the basis of KRW 5,643,00,000, which is the monthly income of the employed for at least 10 years. According to each description including the virtual number, the Plaintiff, while holding his office as the HIE member of the F Religious Organization Gian association, was paid KRW 14,40,000 annually from April 1, 2015 to March 2016, it is difficult to view that all the details deposited in the Plaintiff’s account in the Plaintiff’s name constituted the Plaintiff’s benefits.

Considering this point, the aforementioned evidence alone was that the Plaintiff earned income equivalent to the above statistical income at the time of the instant accident.

(2) income, such as a primary or primary income.