beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
A. Of Jeju-si 105 square meters prior to C, each point is indicated in the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 18, 2013, the Plaintiff purchased 105 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) prior to C in Jeju-si, and acquired the ownership on the 25th of the same month.
B. The Defendant is the owner of Jeju-si, Jeju-si, Jeju-do, Jeju-do, 291 square meters and its ground buildings adjacent to the instant land. Some of the buildings owned by the Defendant are constructed on the instant land as follows. As such, the part of the instant land, which connects each point of the attached drawing Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, and 1 among the instant land, occupies 93 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “instant land”).
1) From among the instant land, the brick structure and sand sales panel built in the part on the ship (A), which connects each point of 2,9,10,11, and 2 to each point of 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 12 in sequence among the instant land, the brick structure and 31 square meters of 31 square meters of 16, 17, 18, 19, and 16 of the attached drawing among the land in this case were connected each point of 2, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 17, 12, and 12; the fact that there is no ground to 20, 21, 222, 23, 200 among the instant land; the fact that there is no ground to 31,000 square meters of the attached drawing among the land in this case; the fact that there is no evidence No. 3, evidence No. 1, 201, and 203
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts, since the defendant violated the plaintiff's ownership by occupying the key land of this case without permission, it is obligated to deliver the key land of this case to the plaintiff and remove each part of the building stated in the above 1-B.
B. The defendant's assertion and determination 1 defendant asserts that the remaining building can not be independently used when removing the building portion stated in the above 1-B, and eventually, the whole building should be removed. Thus, this part of the claim for removal is unlawful.