The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person operating a resting restaurant in the trade name of “Cadow,” and, from around 15:30 on May 19, 2013 to around 17:30 on the same day, from around 15:30 of the same day, the Defendant encouraged employees E to receive 190,000 won in return for time demand beyond the F who found to be a customer and the place of business, and let them receive 190,000 won in return for time demand, thereby promoting the act of receiving money and valuables in return for time demand beyond the place of business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect examination protocol against the defendant or G (including the part concerning the statement of H and F);

1. The application of statutes to the F and H's respective self-written statements and a copy of a business report;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, and Articles 97 subparagraph 6 and 44 (1) of the Food Sanitation Act, and selection of fines;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one day: 100,000 won);

1. Suspension of sentence Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (limited to a fine not exceeding one million won, since it is the first offender who has no criminal record at all, all the facts of the crime are the time of the crime, and it is obvious that the fact of the crime is against the mistake, etc., and thus, the suspended sentence is obvious);