1. The Defendant’s business permission stated in the separate sheet was based on the business transfer on January 18, 2017.

1. The Defendant is obliged to implement the procedure for change of name on January 18, 2017 with respect to the business license listed in the separate sheet for the Plaintiff, as follows.

On November 16, 2016, according to the commission of the Plaintiff, C, and the Defendant, a notary public, who borrowed KRW 30 million from the Plaintiff on November 6, 2016 at the annual interest rate of 25% (payment on July 6, 2016) and on July 6, 2018, entered into a notarized deed (No. 12666) with the content that “C shall guarantee and guarantee the obligation of C’s borrowing money.”

On January 18, 2017, the Defendant drafted a sales contract (a sales contract) with the Plaintiff, stating that “If the Defendant fails to pay the Plaintiff any obligation, he/she will transfer the business license indicated in the attached list.”

Since the defendant has failed to repay the debts specified in the above written statement, it shall transfer the business license to the plaintiff as stated in the attached sheet.

2. In conclusion, the claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.