A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On May 1, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor for night-time room intrusion theft in Msan support on May 1, 2013, and on April 4, 2014, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the port prison.

Criminal facts

On May 7, 2014, the Defendant, using the industrial key, purchased one advanced coke, an industrial contact with luene, which contains a hazardous chemical that causes entertainment, hallucation, or anesthesia, at the trade in the insular point located in the Spoon-Eup at the time of racing, and around May 7, 2014.

At around 00:15 on May 8, 2014, the Defendant injected hallucinogenic substances by inserting the industrial contact agents purchased within the limit of 7-4 spoke-ro 7-4 Manpoon church at Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si on May 8, 2014, in a way that the Defendant inhales them into the entrance of a vinyl baton, and bats them into the entrance of a vinyl bat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (in attachment of results of the search of prisoners, attachment of judgment);

1. Article 58 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Articles 58 subparagraph 3 and 43 (1) of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act, the selection of punishment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime due to a previous conviction as stated in the judgment of the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, and the defendant has the same criminal records of 11 times or inhaled hallucinogenic substances: Provided, That the most identical criminal records have been committed before 6 years or more, it is against the fact that the most identical criminal records have been committed, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the defendant's age, environment, character and health conditions, etc., shall