beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Lot shopping Co., Ltd. (Law Firm Rate, Attorneys Park Jong-young et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
Changwon Market (Attorney Im Young-soo et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
October 20, 2006
The first instance judgment
Changwon District Court Decision 2005Guhap676 Decided February 9, 2006
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
On July 23, 2004, the Defendant revoked the disposition of provisional deliberation on construction for the new construction of the original datum of the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, 92 Ground Do, Changwon-si.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Kim Shin (Presiding Judge)