beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant shall not operate a vehicle on the road that is not covered by mandatory insurance, as a cargo vehicle B, a vehicle with a gallon C, or a owner of a D AB car, and the owner of a vehicle shall not operate a vehicle on the road that is not covered by mandatory insurance.
1. On September 25, 2014, around 17:47, the Defendant operated the said cargo truck, which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front of the Sejong East-dong Road.
2. On October 6, 2014, around 19:08, the Defendant operated the said gallon vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front road located in E at Naju-si.
3. On November 9, 2014, the Defendant, at around 19:09, operated the said gallon vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front of the two gallon road in front of the two wing intersection.
4. On September 13, 2016, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance on the front road of the G village in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
5. On May 25, 2017, around 06:54, the Defendant operated the said cargo truck, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, on the front of the HT on the HT, Young-gun, Youngnam.
6. At around 06:50 on May 30, 2017, the Defendant operated the said Poter truck, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, on the front of the HT on the HT, Youngnam Cancer.
7. At around 18:51 on June 1, 2017, the Defendant operated the said Amanman-car without mandatory insurance on the front of the H Tri-gun H Tri-Ma, Youngnam-gun.
Summary of Evidence
Defendant’s legal statement
Each law applicable to non-insurance operations investigation data
1. Relevant Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the selection of fines, respectively, concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that he/she has been punished twice for the same kind of crime, and the defendant is disadvantageously.