The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and divided his mistake; and (b) the Defendant is deemed to have been punished several times for the same crime; (c) on June 23, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for larceny, etc. on several occasions; (d) even though the judgment became final and conclusive on July 1, 201, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again during the suspended sentence period, and did not agree with the victims until the trial; (e) not only did the Defendant endeavored to recover damage; and (g) considering all other circumstances, comprehensively considering the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means, method, method, and consequence of each of the thief crimes of this case, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is unreasonable, and thus, is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.