logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1983. 4. 7.자 83모11 결정
[재심청구기각결정에대한재항고][공1983.6.1.(705),842]
Main Issues

The meaning of "when clear evidence under Article 420 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Act is newly discovered"

Summary of Judgment

The term "when clear evidence is newly discovered" as provided in subparagraph 5 of Article 420 of the Criminal Procedure Act means the time when, in the litigation procedures in the finalized original judgment, no evidence has been found or could not be submitted even if it was discovered, and the evidence is found or can be submitted that the objective advantage is recognized compared to that of other evidence in the value of evidence.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 420(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Order 62Mo26 Decided April 27, 1965 81Mo7 dated February 21, 1981 81Mo12 Decided May 21, 1981

Re-appellant

Re-Appellants

Defense Counsel

Attorney Tae-chul et al.

The order of the court below

Seoul High Court Order 80Ro33 dated February 10, 1983

Text

The reappeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of reappeal are examined.

When clear evidence under Article 420 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act is newly discovered, the term "when it was not discovered in the litigation procedures in the finalized original judgment, or even if it was discovered, and it was impossible to submit it, and the evidence is the time when it was discovered or is possible to find or submit an objective superior advantage compared to that of other evidence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Order 81Mo12, May 25, 1981). Thus, the records are examined, and it is not possible to find any circumstances that a certified copy of the theory of lawsuit or a contract for the establishment of a special agreement agency cannot be submitted after the final judgment was made, and it is not possible to find any such circumstance that it was impossible to submit a new one after the final judgment was made, and the value of evidence is objectively superior to other evidence. Therefore, the court below's ruling dismissing the request for a retrial because it does not constitute a new evidence, and thus, it is not possible

Therefore, the reappeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Jeon Soo-hee (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1983.2.10자 80로33