(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.06.26 2014나12818

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.06.26 2014나12818

손해배상금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. The defendant’s new assertion in the court of first instance is the same as the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the additional determination under paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2, "721" in Part 4 shall be changed to "731".

Part 2, Paragraph 11, "the handcar" (hereinafter "the car center of this case") is "the handcar".

Part 2 "Business" in Part 12 shall be changed to "Ka Center and Three Deputy Business."

From the second side to the third side, the 4th "Facilities for the Third Deputy Director" shall be "the facilities for the Third Deputy Director (hereinafter "the facilities for the third Deputy Director")".

Part 3, "Facilities for the Deputy Director" in Part 1 shall be deemed to be "the site and buildings of the Deputy Director," "lease Deposit" to be "lease Deposit," and "lease Term" to be "lease Deposit," respectively.

Part 3, "Lease Agreement" in Part 2 shall be regarded as "lease Agreement".

Part 6, "Nos. 6 to 8-2" in Part 5 shall be changed to "Nos. 6, 8-1, 2-2."

2. Additional determination

A. According to the selective amount agreement, the Defendant asserts that the content of the instant agreement should be paid KRW 20 million or KRW 12 million with compensation for damage caused by fraud, considering that each letter was written in a separate document, on May 16, 2014, the Defendant stated the same purpose of payment as “compensation for damage caused by fraud,” “additional payment,” and that the content of the instant agreement should be paid KRW 20 million with compensation for damage caused by fraud.

In light of the fact that two copies of the above letter are prepared at the same time and at the same time, the amount and the date of payment are different, and there is no other statement to invalidate each letter, each of the above forms shall be paid by the defendant in total 32 million won.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2015.12.24 2015나57824

-광주지방법원 2014.10.21 2014가단26663

-대전고등법원 2016.11.11 2016나13633

-서울고등법원 2016.06.01 2015누68019

-대전지방법원 2015.11.18 2015나102987