logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.18 2015나102987
구상금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the part 2. of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the judgment of the court of first instance is written in the following manner.

[Supplementary Use] The last sentence of the first instance court's second sentence, the third part "Defendant A Farming Corporation" in the third part shall be "A", each "Defendant A Corporation" in the first instance court's judgment shall be "A", and each "FF Agricultural Cooperative" in the third part and second part of the third part of the first instance court's judgment and "FFF Agricultural Cooperative" in the first instance court's judgment shall be deemed "A", respectively.

In Part 2, "as stated in the cause of the claim in the attached Form 18," and in Part 3, "in Sub-section 2," "the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, the amount of insurance coverage of 120,000,000 won, and the period of insurance from December 10, 2012 to December 31, 2013," respectively, "Defendant C and D" in Part 3 is "the Defendant, B, and E".

In the 3rd part, “Plaintiff” was added to “A is due to the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the sales amount (goods payment) to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor,” and “The payment by subrogation was made from November 1, 2014” in the 5th part to “The payment by subrogation was made,” and the claim for reimbursement is based on November 1, 2014.”

Part 3, Paragraph 19 of Paragraph 19 " is limited, and the transaction that the plaintiff paid insurance money to the plaintiff's supplementary intervenor is not included in the guarantee of the above insurance contract because the transaction between the head office and the plaintiff's supplementary intervenor who are not the Seoul branch office and not included in the guarantee of the above insurance contract."

Part 4, “The fact that the evidence Nos. 1 and 2-C through 3-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C

arrow