1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is subject to Paragraph (1).

The reasoning of the judgment of this court cited in the judgment of the first instance is as follows, and the decision of this court on the argument that the defendant emphasizes or adds in the trial is added to the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of the judgment as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (excluding the part on co-defendant C of the first instance court, which becomes separated and finalized). Therefore, it shall be cited including the summary thereof pursuant to

Part 2, in Part 15, "Defendant Company B (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant Company") and not more than 15 "Defendant Company" are all referred to as "Defendants" and "Defendant Company", respectively.

Part 2, the term “instant transfer contract” (hereinafter referred to as “instant transfer contract”) shall be read as “(hereinafter referred to as “instant transfer contract,” and the Defendant shall pay the amount to be paid to the Plaintiff due to the instant transfer contract (hereinafter referred to as “the instant transfer proceeds”).

Part 3, in Part 1, "The Agreement of this case" shall be amended to "the Agreement on Entrustment of the Keeping of Promissory Notes and Certificate of Custody (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement of this case")".

Part 3 (Exclusion of Action in the Table), “The above lawsuit was withdrawn,” and “the above lawsuit was withdrawn,” and the part 9 through 10 of Part 3 (No. 9) deleted, “the Defendant Company received one of the bills of this case in the custody of Law Firm(LLC) D.”

Part 3: The following shall be added between Part 10 and 11:

A person shall be appointed.

E. Around December 4, 2013, the Plaintiff, the representative director of which was I, sent a written confirmation to the Law Firm (LLC) that “The Plaintiff received KRW 1 billion from the Defendant on January 21, 2013, and KRW 500 million on December 4, 2013, and KRW 1 billion on which the Plaintiff received KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

Type 3, 11.