logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017. 11. 10. 선고 2016나81989 판결
[손해배상(기)][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant and Appellant

Plaintiff 1 and five others (Law Firm Woo, Attorney Lee Young-chul, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, appellant and appellee

TND Co., Ltd. (Bae & Yang LLC, Attorneys Lee Jae-in, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

October 17, 2017

The first instance judgment

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016Da5046362 Decided November 17, 2016

Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 60 million won with 5% interest per annum from July 7, 2015 to the service date of the original copy of the payment order in this case, and 15% interest per annum from the next day to the full payment date.

2. Purport of appeal

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the amount of additional payment order shall be revoked. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 12,00,000 won with 5% interest per annum from July 7, 2015 to November 17, 2016, and 15% interest per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment.

Defendant: The part against the Defendant in the first instance judgment is revoked, and the Plaintiffs’ claim corresponding to the revoked part is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the partial dismissal as follows. Therefore, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○. △△○○○○○○○○○○○. △△○○○○○○,” respectively, of the 2th instance judgment, 15, 3, 4, and 4 18.

○○, the 15th page of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as the “Magmo Model”) shall be applied to the “advertisement Model Contract”.

○○○ 5th written judgment of the first instance court, the 5th written judgment of the first instance court, "this judgment", shall be applied to "the first instance judgment".

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiffs' appeal and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Justices Kim Jong-tae (Presiding Justice)

arrow