logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.04.22 2013고정200
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 10, 2012, around 23:10 on September 10, 2012, Defendants shared, around the dwelling entrance of Defendant A of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2nd floor D 16, the above entrance obstructed the passage by opening outside the door, and thus, the victim E (ma, 36 years old), Defendant B called the victim E as the victim E; Defendant B took the victim E as the victim E; Defendant F (ma, 38 years old); Defendant A took the face of the victim E and the victim F (ma, 38 years old); Defendant A took the victim E and the victim F face as drinking together.

Defendant A continued to take part of the victim E face into consideration the hand, body, face part, etc. of the victim E, which is over the floor of the floor, in a number of times of drinking, and the defendant B took part of the victim F’s fingers, and the victim F’s face was taken into consideration by drinking it.

In the end, the Defendants jointly agreed to the victims E in order to give approximately six weeks of treatment to victims, and the victim F inception dynasium, etc., where the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of F and E;

1. A written diagnosis of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site reports;

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (elective of Fines) of the same Act;

1. Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.

arrow