A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the multi-family house called Pyeongtaek-si B.

1. A person who intends to construct or repair a building in an urban area in violation of the Building Act and the National Land Planning and Utilization Act shall obtain permission from the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, the Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu, and shall comply with the district unit plan in order

Around July 12, 2011, the Defendant obtained a construction permit from around October 31, 201, on the purport that the said multi-family house located in a district unit planning zone is constructed with a total of three households, such as a total floor area of 285.44 square meters, a multi-household (two households), and a multi-household (one household), from two floors above the ground.

Nevertheless, from October 201 to November 201 of the same year, the Defendant arbitrarily expanded the “B” multi-family house from the previous three households to the 14 households in Do, Do and 14 households (7 households in Do and 2nd floor) by installing a studio and a studio, respectively, in the individual rooms of the first floor, the second floor, and the second floor, which failed to meet the district unit plan without obtaining permission from the competent authorities.

2. A person who intends to build or install buildings and other facilities that cause demand for parking in a district unit planning zone violating the Parking Lot Act shall install an annexed parking lot inside such facilities or on the site thereof;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from October 201 to November 201 of the same year, installed a boundary wall and entrance, etc. to 14 households in each unit of the “B” multi-family house from around 201 to around 11 of the same year, and extended the total number of 3 households in each unit of the “B” multi-family house to 14 households in the Do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each statement of C, D, E, and F;

1. The current status of the ordinary building ledger and building drawings; and