logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.21 2014가단151500
손해배상(자)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 260,558,091, Plaintiff B’s KRW 170,372,061, and each of the said money, from November 7, 2013.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) The net C is a D-wing and 3 freezing vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 03:54 on November 7, 2013, around 03:54.

(ii) When driving a vehicle and driving a Hamna car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) in the same place as in the above temporary border, driving a vehicle at a two-lane speed of about 115.2 km/h in order to find out the vehicle from the side of the vehicle and to avoid it to the direction of the vehicle in front, the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of it. The Defendant parked the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of it. The vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of it. The vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the two-lane in front of the five lane in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the other. The vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the other in front of the other in front of the other in front of the other in front of the vehicle in front of the other in front of the other in front of the latter. The vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the other in front of the other in front of the other in front.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”. 3) The Plaintiff is the deceased’s wife, the Plaintiff B is the deceased’s wife, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. [The grounds for recognition: the fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s entries in subparagraphs 1 through 8, 20 through 23, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is the insurer of the defendant vehicle and is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs, who are the deceased and their bereaved families.

(c) limitation of liability, however, the Defendant’s vehicle is driving on the expressway at night at night while driving on the expressway.

arrow