1. The Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff’s KRW 355,969,792, and KRW 7,000,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 3,00,000 to Plaintiff C.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) D is the E rocketing car (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) around 19:50 on December 31, 2014, around 19:50.

(ii)the driver's driving of a motor vehicle and the driver's driving of a motor vehicle into the two-lane road at a point of 8.4 km in the upstream of the west Coastal Highway, which is located in the eculation of the eculation, and the driver's operating of a motor vehicle and driving a motor vehicle at a point of 8.4 km in the parallel of the two-lane road, and the motor vehicle followed by the latter from the first lane is inevitably changed to the first one, and at that time, the net F (hereinafter referred

(2) The Plaintiff’s vehicle is a “Plaintiff’s vehicle” (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s vehicle”).

(1) The front part of the Defendant 1’s vehicle was the rear part of the vehicle (hereinafter “instant primary accident”).

2) After the instant first collision, D’s defect that the deceased, who is aboard the Plaintiff’s vehicle, installed a triular line on the part of the deceased, and when the deceased is behind the triular line of the vehicle in order to install the sign of the broken vehicle, such as a triular line, at the triular line of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, H driving an IK3 vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 2 vehicle”) along the one-lane of the said expressway, while driving the vehicle along the said expressway with the one-lane, while failing to accurately operate the steering section and the steering system, due to the instant first collision, by negligence, failing to accurately see the steering section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the failure to accurately operate the steering and steering system, the deceased was assigned to the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the front part of the Plaintiff’s 2 vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as "the second accident of this case" c) immediately after the occurrence of the accident, J is called K New Tour bus (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant 3 vehicle").

In the case of Defendant 2’s failure to accurately operate the front section and the steering system of Defendant 2, which was stopped due to the instant secondary collision, by driving the said Highway along one lane, and driving the said Highway, Defendant 2’s vehicle was placed in the front section of Defendant 3’s vehicle and had Defendant 2 use the front section of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Plaintiff’s vehicle.