logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.12 2017가합582508
구상금
Text

1. Defendant DB Insurance Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 91,317,120 for the Plaintiff and its related amount from November 4, 2017 to July 12, 2018.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The following facts shall not be disputed between the parties, or may be recognized by comprehensively considering the purpose of the entire pleadings in each entry or video set forth in Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including each number, if any).

The insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to AK3 Passenger Vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant D non-life insurance company (hereinafter “Defendant D non-life insurance”) are the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B rocketing Passenger Vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant 1”), and the Defendant National Bus Transport Business Association Federation (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) are the mutual aid business operators who entered into the automobile mutual aid agreement with respect to C New Franchise Bus (hereinafter “Defendant 2”).

D On December 31, 2014, around 19:50 on December 31, 2014, the driving of Defendant 1 and driving at a two-lane of the 8.4km road at the upstream of the west Coastal Highway, which is located in the lusium in the lusium of the lusium, at the top of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane road, and the vehicle followed by the latter from the first lane was inevitably changed to the one-lane, and at the same time, the front part of the driver’s vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “victim’s vehicle”) of the network E (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) driven into the rear part of Defendant 1.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant primary accident.” After the instant primary accident, D refers to the deceased who is aboard the damaged vehicle, and when the deceased is behind the string line of the vehicle in order to install a sign of a broken vehicle, such as a tring line, in the tring line of the damaged vehicle, G is negligent in driving the Plaintiff vehicle along the one lane of the said expressway, and failing to accurately operate the steering direction and the brake system, while proceeding along the said expressway, G is behind the tring line as above.

arrow