Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 00:30 on March 9, 2018, the Defendant 2018 Goyang-Ma533 was under the influence of drinking along the underground passage route near C Bank located in Namyang-si, and was transferred to a safe place by the police officer E at the police station of the Namyang-gu Police Station, who called to the site after having received a report of 112 on this, and was moved to the site. After the police officer E at the police station of the Namyang-gu Police Station, who was called to the site, the Defendant 1 took measures to move to the safe place by the police officer E at the police officer at the police station of the Namyang-gu Police Station, who was called to the site. For the Defendant’s returning home, the police officer E changed the call to the Defendant’s his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers against 112 reports and crime prevention.
around 09:00 on September 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) asked the background of the report by the head of the police station of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station H District Haak, who was dispatched to the site after receiving the Defendant’s 112 report to commit suicide in the Fel G of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 23, 2017; (b) stated that “the head of the Dongdong Police Station H District Hak-gu Hak-kak,” “Woo Hakkkk-kak,” “Ik-kick,” “Ik-kick-kick,” and “Ik-kick-kick, Ik-kick-kick,” and assault the Defendant, who would interfere with the above I’s face, to stop his visit.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order by police officers.
Summary of Evidence
"2018 Highest 533"
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Statement of the police statement of E;
1. Damage photographs;
1. Each investigation report "2018 Highest 1515";
1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;
1. Statement of the police officer to I;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of J;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the relevant criminal facts;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's claim for mental disability under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act.