[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

A. Around 20:00 on August 18, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance for about 20 minutes by force by avoiding disturbance between 20 minutes of plastic chairs and metal systems while leaving the victim’s wife G, etc. while leaving the victim’s wife G, etc. for the reason that he refused to calculate the number of employees within the “F restaurant” in the operation of the victim E located in Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan.

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by: (a) the head of the police station of the Busan East Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving 112 reports after committing the crime described in paragraph (1), arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender and arrested him as a flagrant offender; (b) the head of the police station of the Busan East Police Station; (c) the head of the police station of the police station of the Busan Police Station of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea

2. The Defendant: (a) arrested B in the act of committing an act of committing a crime under paragraph (1) at the border of the H Zone B; and (b) interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate performance of official duties in relation to the arrest of flagrant offenders by taking away and spreading I’s arms in his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement to E, I, and J;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts: Articles 136(1), 314(1), 37, and 38 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the commercial concurrence (Defendant B);

1. The former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (Defendant B);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B) of the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A) is the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties against Defendant B.