Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is an educational foundation that establishes and operates the Gyeong National University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
The deceased C (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") is a patient who was diagnosed and treated by the Defendant Hospital as a student, and the plaintiff A is the father of the deceased C, and the plaintiff B is the father of the deceased C.
B. On August 14, 201, the Deceased was born at a house, and returned to the Defendant’s Emergency Medical Center after the first time after the inspection.
C. On September 23, 201, one month after the Deceased’s month after being hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital via E Hospital, re-exploited during classes at the school.
As a result of various tests, the medical team at Defendant Hospital diagnosed the deceased as a non-speeded heart mar (nsustaed tachymania). On October 6, 2011, the medical team at Defendant Hospital performed an electrical physiological test (EPS) and a high frequency of the heart marcule typhome (hereinafter “the instant procedure”) with respect to the heart marcule occurring from the outflow of the heart room (hereinafter “the instant procedure”). After the instant procedure, the frequency of the heart marction consent was remarkably lowered.
On October 8, 2011, the Deceased discharged from the Defendant Hospital on October 8, 2011, and did not seem to have a unique symptoms during the period of hospitalization.
The Defendant Hospital prescribed about 15 days of play for the purpose of preventing cardiopulmonary beer at the time of discharge of the Deceased, and notified the Deceased on October 22, 201, which is two weeks later.
On October 22, 2011, the Deceased moved to the Defendant Hospital, and the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital conducted the heart examination, and prescribed 30 days of play.
After January 25, 2012, the Deceased was used as a axis and moved back to the Defendant Hospital again, and the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital prescribed approximately 63 days, called tepla, for the prevention of mental and physical addiction.
E. On February 4, 2012, the Deceased died while being used for a axis and transferred to the Defendant hospital, and the cause of death is the symptoms of acute funeral services.
[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, entry of Gap's evidence 1 through 9, and against the president of the Central University Hospital of this Court.