logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.10 2016가단506089
진료비
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) B, the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) B, the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff), C, and D are the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is a person operating the E Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff Hospital”), and the network F (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) was killed after the Plaintiff’s hospital received vertebrate ebrate (hereinafter referred to as “the instant surgery”). Defendant B is the deceased’s spouse, Defendant C, and D’s children.

B. 1) On January 27, 2015, the Deceased was admitted to the Plaintiff Hospital, and on January 29, 2015, the medical personnel at the Plaintiff Hospital performed the instant surgery with respect to the Deceased. 2) At the time of the instant surgery, the medical personnel at the Plaintiff Hospital administered the instant surgery to the Deceased at the time of the instant surgery 2,00 square meters from January 29, 2015 to January 18:30, 200, 13:15 to 16:15 of the same day, 50 square meters from 14:30 to 18:300 of the same day, and 14:30 to 14:30 of the same day, and 17:30 through 18:30 of the same day, respectively, a new Frante (PP) unit to the Deceased.

3) From January 29, 2015 to January 22, 2015, the Deceased had not been sufficiently increased in steculation. From around 22:30 on the same day, the Plaintiff’s medical personnel showed the symptoms of the pulmonary urcology, such as the increase of steculing on both sides of pulmonary radiation, etc. Around 22:30 on January 30, 2015, the Plaintiff’s medical personnel administered 10 meters of urcology to the Deceased. Around 09:00 on January 30, 2015, at around 12:30 on the same day, the Plaintiff’s hospital continued to be administered at intervals of 6 hours from the date of the operation, but at around 13:0 on the same date, the Plaintiff’s hospital did not take measures against the Deceased on the part of the deceased, but rejected the deceased’s consent on the part of Nonparty 1, 2015.

2 The Deceased is transferred to a H hospital.

arrow